Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane
CADs Students

Some documents within our site are in PDF format. You might need Acrobat Reader to view them.
pdf documentAcrobat Reader

PowerPointThis site uses PowerPoint files, for information on viewing these files click here.

Al Akhawayn University

Facebook

Faculty Development

Workshops 2004

Spring 2004
Workshops on Student Evaluation

As a follow-up to the general session on testing and project evaluation, several workshops were conducted in small groups to discuss and share understanding of more specific evaluation issues. These were held concurrently in Building 10 classrooms, on Tuesday, March 30, 2004.

The first Essay Test workshop was held with three teachers discussing important issues in developing essay test items, using a handout prepared by Peter Doolittle of Virginia Polytech (which is on the CAD web site), a matrix matching course objectives to assessment methods (available from Dr. Rathbun’s web site), and a typology of essay test questions with examples. We examined the essay questions that the teachers brought and identified ways in which the items could be improved. The session lasted approximately 90 minutes.

The first two workshops both dealt with aspects of grading written or essay style exams. Points raised included

  • a matrix for matching course objectives to assessment methods
  • a mismatch between students' level of thought and expressive ability
  • the taxonomy of essay question types
  • a significant difference across disciplines about what "essay response" items are
  • the grading schemes
  • holistic vs analytic scoring rubrics
Project based evaluation

The workshop on Project Based assessment attended by seven teachers (2 SSE, 1 SHSS, 4 CAD) intended to open the floor to all participants to discuss aspects of projects that had worked well or not so well. One possible purpose of the discussion was to determine if projects succeed in providing a forum for performance by students, for the purpose of assessing whether or not they have learned specific course components. Another area of interest was to check students’ ability to actually learn to develop higher levels of understanding of the course through the activities demanded by projects.

Evaluation Considerations
  • Process vs product
  • Individual contributions to the finished product
  • Criteria for assessment
    • Grading schemes
    • Grading objectives
    • Time vs effort vs output

Criteria for analysis:

  • Group composition
  • Instructions
  • Weighting of different components
  • Variety of tasks
  • Reliance on skills not taught in this course
Two examples:

SSK 1202 - Critical Reading and Problem Solving Process

SSK 1202 - Critical Reading and Problem Solving Project Descriptions and Examples

Accessible Website Menu

PO Box 104 Hassan II Avenue, 53000 IFRANE, Morocco
Phone: (+212)535-862-430 - Fax: (+212)-535-862-431
Contact email: CAD@aui.ma

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS